MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403944836 · doi:10.1049/ipr2.13230

Simultaneous single image super‐resolution and blind Gaussian denoising via slim ghost full‐frequency residual blocks

2024· article· en· W4403944836 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Image Processing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Image Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResidualNoise reductionGaussianSuperresolutionArtificial intelligenceResolution (logic)Computer scienceImage denoisingPattern recognition (psychology)Image (mathematics)AlgorithmComputer visionPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Given that super‐resolution (SR) aims to recover lost information, and low‐resolution (LR) images in real‐world conditions might be corrupted with multiple degradations, considering basic bicubic down‐sampling as the sole degradation significantly limits the performance of most existing SR models. This paper presents a model for simultaneous super‐resolution and blind additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) denoising with two components (netdeg and netSR) that is based on a generative adversarial network (GAN) to achieve detailed results. netdeg, featuring residual and innovative cost‐effective ghost residual blocks with a frequency separation module for obtaining long‐range information, blindly restores a clean version of the LR image. netSR leverages slim ghost full‐frequency residual blocks to process low‐frequency (LF) and high‐frequency (HF) information via static large convolutions and pixel‐wise highlighted input‐adaptive dynamic convolutions, respectively. To address the susceptibility of dynamic layers to noise and preserve feature diversity while reducing model’s costs, static and dynamic layer features are combined and highlighted. Diverse and non‐redundant features are then processed using ghost‐style blocks. The proposed model achieves comparable SR results in bicubic down‐sampling scenarios, outperform existing SR methods in the complex task of concurrent SR and AWGN denoising, and demonstrate robustness in handling images corrupted with varying levels of AWGN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.720
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it