THE STATUS OF A. DEMIDOV’S MINING COMPLEX IN ALTAI IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE LEGAL FRAMEWORK OF SIBERIA IN THE SECOND QUARTER OF THE XVIII CENTURY
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Russia's transition to the early Imperial state model in the first quarter of the XVIII century required qualitative changes in the management model, for example realization of departmental and sectoral distinctions, incorporating of large private economic units in the regional and national structure. The purpose of the article is to analyze the formation and key parameters of the status of the Kolyvan-Voskresensk plants (Kolyvan-Voskresensk mining department) in the administrative legal system of Siberia during the period, when the industrial complex belonged to A. Demidov. The research was based on the materials of the collections of the Russian State Archive of Ancient Documents and the State Archive of the Sverdlovsk Region, as well as some published documents. The author shows that the formation of the Demidov’s industrial district in Altai at the initial stage the level and nature of the realization of institutional and functional distinctions did not allow to completely overcome the legal unsettled situation in this area. Most of the critical problem of intersectoral cooperation in relation to the Kolyvan-Voskresensky plants were regulated in the early 1730s. The civil authorities made attempts to covertly resist the strengthening of the influence of A. Demidov's private ownership structures and his mining complex in the administrative system of Siberia in second quarter of XVIIIth century.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it