Bibliographic record
Abstract
Consider the flow through a channel with grooved edges on one (or both) side(s). If heating is applied to the boundaries, thermal drift is the flow generated by the interaction of the groove and heating patterns. It is known that, if one side of a channel is smooth while the other is grooved, the application of heating forms a so-called ‘thermal drift engine’. Two thermal drift engines are activated if both surfaces are grooved, and these may reinforce or oppose each other. Carefully choosing these engines can lead to an intensification of the thermal drift. The interplay of two drift engines is explored using a horizontal slot with grooves that have a sinusoidal profile with a prescribed wavenumber $\alpha $ . It is shown that the strength of the flow decreases proportional to $\alpha $ as $\alpha \to 0$ and proportional to ${\alpha ^{ - 1}}$ as $\alpha \to \infty $ . We determine the value of $\alpha $ corresponding to the strongest flow and characterize how the conclusions should be modified if a uniform heating component is added to the heating pattern.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".