MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403949769 · doi:10.5376/mpb.2024.15.0029

Systematic Analysis of QTLs for Rice Yield and Quality: From Mapping to Application

2024· article· en· W4403949769 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yumin Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Plant Breeding · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyQuantitative trait locusYield (engineering)Quality (philosophy)BiotechnologyAgronomyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rice ( Oryza sativa L.) is a major food crop crucial to global food security, and its yield and quality are the most important traits for improvement. This study examines the quantitative trait loci (QTL) associated with rice yield and quality, details their localization, mechanism, and application in breeding programs, and explores the historical development of QTL mapping techniques, from traditional two-parent hybridization to advanced methods such as genome-wide association studies (GWAS). The genetic mechanisms and regulatory pathways of key QTLS affecting yield components such as grain number, panicle length, biomass, grain size, amylose content, aroma and other quality traits were discussed. By analyzing previous studies, this study highlights the successful identification and application of these QTLS in the breeding of high-yield and high-quality rice varieties, and illustrates how QTL data can be integrated into breeding strategies through marker-assisted selection (MAS) and genomic selection (GS). The purpose of this study is to provide some scientific basis for the next research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.239
Threshold uncertainty score0.371

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Plant BreedingSame topicGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsFrench-language works237,207