Bibliographic record
Abstract
The received view does not associate David Hume with the genesis of the labor theory of value, but as is argued here, Hume issued a number of key propositions that belong to the labor theory of value such that he rightly belongs to the classical school of political economy. Hume articulated both the analytic claim, that labor is the primary determinant of exchange-value and hence the price, and the explanatory claim, that a price could be reduced down to the labor embodied in its production. His attention, however, was directed more to the quality than the quantity of labor and in that respect there was no direct correlation between the temporal units of labor and the price. Insofar as wages and profits are inversely related, or so he argued, the falling rate of profit over the past century meant that wages had become the primary factor in determing a price. Furthermore, Hume treated capital goods as stored labor, and put much weight on the role of the new work ethic and the growth of artisanal production which had contributed, in part, to the unprecedented wealth of Western Europe. Hume also recommended that the state adopt policies to improve the mobility and supply of labor, and promote a healthier and happier population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.040 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".