MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403956209 · doi:10.62347/cwfr7413

Assessment of frailty status in patients with acute cerebral infarction and their relationship with serum markers

2024· article· en· W4403956209 on OpenAlex
Jun Wang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Translational Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFrailty in Older Adults
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCerebral infarctionInternal medicineEmergency medicineIntensive care medicineIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Frailty status is closely related to cerebral infarction, but there is a lack of objective biomarkers to determine frailty status in cerebral infarction patients. This study explores frailty status and frailty-related serum markers in patients with acute cerebral infarction and determines their diagnostic value for frailty. METHODS: A total of 146 patients with acute cerebral infarction admitted to Hangzhou Third people's Hospital from January 2021 to December 2023 were enrolled prospectively. The Edmonton scale was used to evaluate the patients in the frailty and non-frailty groups. The clinical frailty scale (CFS) was used to divide frailty patients into mild, moderate, and severe frailty groups, comparing clinical data and levels of serum markers among different groups, and analyzing the risk factors for frailty in cerebral infarction. RESULTS: Among the 146 patients, 70 cases (47.9%) were in the frailty group, and 76 cases (52.1%) in the non-frailty group. Compared with patients in the non-frailty group, patients in the frailty group had significantly lower levels of hemoglobin, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein, and albumin (P<0.05 or 0.01), while levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, and homocysteine (Hcy) were significantly increased (P<0.05 or 0.01). Logistic regression analysis found that the levels of hemoglobin and Hcy were independent risk factors for frailty in acute cerebral infarction patients, with the ROC curve areas of 0.707 and 0.751, respectively. The ROC curve area for predicting frailty by combining hemoglobin and Hcy levels was 0.799. CONCLUSION: The incidence of frailty in patients with acute cerebral infarction is high, and serum markers of hemoglobin and Hcy have certain value in determining frailty in patients with acute cerebral infarction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.342

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it