MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403969767 · doi:10.55016/ojs/cdm.v19i3.74134

A linear time approach to three-dimensional reconstruction by discrete tomography

2024· article· en· W4403969767 on OpenAlex
Matthew Ceko, Silvia M.C. Pagani, R. Tijdeman

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueContributions to Discrete Mathematics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Image Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMonash University
KeywordsMathematicsTomographyAlgorithmApplied mathematicsMathematical optimizationMedicineRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The goal of discrete tomography is to reconstruct an unknown function $f$ via a given set of line sums. In addition to requiring accurate reconstructions, it is favourable to be able to perform the task in a timely manner. This is complicated by the presence of ghosts, which allow many solutions to exist in general. In this paper we consider the case of a function $f : A \to \mathbb{R}$ where $A$ is a finite grid in $\mathbb{Z}^3$. Previous work has shown that in the two-dimensional case it is possible to determine all solutions in parameterized form in linear time (with respect to the number of directions and the grid size) regardless of whether the solution is unique. In this work, we show that a similar linear method exists in three dimensions under the condition of nonproportionality. We show that the condition of nonproportionality is fulfilled in the case of three-dimensional boundary ghosts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.809
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it