Measurements of $WH$ and $ZH$ production with Higgs boson decays into bottom quarks and direct constraints on the charm Yukawa coupling in $13\,\mathrm{TeV}$ $pp$ collisions with the ATLAS detector
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A study of the Higgs boson decaying into bottom quarks ($H \to b\bar{b}$) and charm quarks ($H \to c\bar{c}$) is performed, in the associated production channel of the Higgs boson with a $W$ or $Z$ boson, using $140\,\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data at $\sqrt{s} = 13\,\mathrm{TeV}$ collected by the ATLAS detector. The individual production of $WH$ and $ZH$ with $H \to b\bar{b}$ is established with observed (expected) significances of $5.3$ ($5.5$) and $4.9$ ($5.6$). Differential cross-section measurements of the gauge boson transverse momentum within the simplified template cross-section framework are performed in a total of 13 kinematical fiducial regions. The search for the $H \to c\bar{c}$ decay yields an observed (expected) upper limit at 95% confidence level of $11.5$ ($10.6$) times the Standard Model prediction. The results are also used to set constraints on the charm coupling modifier, resulting in $|\kappa_c| < 4.2$ at 95% confidence level. Combining the $H \to b\bar{b}$ and $H \to c\bar{c}$ measurements constrains the absolute value of the ratio of Higgs-charm and Higgs-bottom coupling modifiers ($|\kappa_c/\kappa_b|$) to be less than $3.6$ at 95% confidence level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".