Academician of architecture E. I. Kirichenko: Biographic research experience
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The creative legacy of a prominent scientist, academician of the Academy of Architecture and Building Sciences, Honorary Academician of the Russian Academy of Arts, Doctor of Art History Evgenia Ivanovna Kirichenko (1931–2021) occupies a special place in the history of world architecture. She is the author of almost 500 scientific papers, including more than 40 author's and collective monographs. Evgenia Kirichenko became the first Russian researcher of architecture in Spain, Portugal, Canada, and Latin America. She has a priority in the study of architectural structures in Russia of the XIX–XX centuries, the creation of fundamental research on the activities of architects F. Shekhtel, V. Kosyakova, A. Kaminsky, I. Bondarenko. Thanks to Evgenia Kirichenko's participation in deep and comprehensive research, the Cathedral of Christ the Savior was recreated in Moscow, and the restoration of lost works of civil and church architecture began. Her works are widely known to specialists, awarded the State Prize of Russia, medals, diplomas. However, the biographical data of E.I. Kirichenko, whose ancestral roots originate in the Komi Republic from the well-known Zhakovs family, were previously practically not introduced into scientific circulation and are very limited in the literature. The basis for our first biographical research experience was written, pictorial and material sources received in 2022–2023 at the Museum of History and Culture of Syktyvdin district named after E.A. Nalimova (village of Vylgort). They belonged to the family of E.I. Kirichenko, and are currently in a state of museum processing. In addition, the authors had the opportunity to study the current archive of E.I. Kirichenko, deposited in her Moscow apartment: rare photographs, documents, letters from the war years, revealing the life of young Evgenia Kirichenko under Nazi occupation. All this complex of materials, reflected for the first time in the form of an article, allowed us to present the process of formation and development of the bright personality of Evgenia Kirichenko, who gave her life to science.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".