Adaptive Transmission of Cognitive Radio- and Segmented zeRIS-Aided Symbiotic Radio
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a cognitive radio (CR)-enabled symbiotic ambient backscatter communication (AmBC) system with the help of a zero-energy reconfigurable intelligent surface (zeRIS). An adaptive transmission (AT) strategy for the zeRIS is devised based on the amount of harvested energy. Specifically, when energy reserve is insufficient, the zeRIS merely reflects signals without any phase adjustments (PAs), whereas under sufficient energy conditions, it reflects signals following precise PAs. Moreover, a segmented zeRIS is adopted by taking primary transmission (PT) and backscatter transmission (BT) into account. Following this, the coexistence outage probability and ergodic capacity are derived to assess the reliability and effectiveness of the proposed model, respectively. Their asymptotic performance is analyzed to gain insightful observations. Finally, simulation results are provided to verify the accuracy of the theoretical analysis, confirming that AT offers improved reliability, system rate, and energy efficiency over non-adaptive transmission. Furthermore, CR-aided AT demonstrates superior energy efficiency compared to non-CR-assisted AT. It is also crucial to note that the allocation of reflective elements between PT and BT must be reasonably managed to satisfy specific system requirements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".