Modern broiler chickens exhibit a differential gastrointestinal immune and metabolic response to repeated CpG injection relative to a 1950s heritage broiler breed
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Athens Canadian Random Bred (ACRB) heritage broiler breed, which has not been selectively bred since the 1950s, is a point of comparison to the modern-day broiler and could highlight potential genetic-derived differences in immune responses. To observe the modern and heritage birds' immune responses in action, the innate immune ligand CpG oligonucleotides were administered at multiple time points through the birds' lives from the day after hatch to day 35 post-hatch. This study allowed for the observation of changes in metabolic and immune signaling in response to repeated injections of a known Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligand, CpG. Jejunum and cecal tonsil samples at multiple time points during grow out were collected and used for kinome array analysis to measure kinase activity in immunometabolic signaling pathways in the gut tissue. In addition cytokine gene expression was measured in these tissues. The modern birds' response to the treatment was more innate and showed evidence of metabolic energy shift. The heritage birds' response to the treatment was adaptive, with metabolic changes indicative of a well-regulated response. Overall, the results from this study suggest that modern broiler chickens do not adequately balance resources between growth and immune responses during an immune challenge, and this deficit is most evident around the 2-week post-hatch time point. This is a critical time for these birds, as their muscle deposition continues to accelerate, and they are vulnerable to disease challenges. Ideally, future work can clarify the reason for this response discrepancy in the modern broiler and therapeutic interventions to rescue this phenotype could be elucidated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".