Status of islet transplantation and innovations to sustainable outcomes: novel sites, cell sources, and drug delivery strategies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Islet transplantation (ITx) is an effective means to restore physiologic glycemic regulation in those living with type 1 diabetes; however, there are a handful of barriers that prevent the broad application of this functionally curative procedure. The restricted cell supply, requisite for life-long toxic immunosuppression, and significant immediate and gradual graft attrition limits the procedure to only those living with brittle diabetes. While intraportal ITx is the primary clinical site, portal vein-specific factors including low oxygen tension and the instant blood-mediated inflammatory reaction are detrimental to initial engraftment and long-term function. These factors among others prevent the procedure from granting recipients long-term insulin independence. Herein, we provide an overview of the status and limitations of ITx, and novel innovations that address the shortcomings presented. Despite the marked progress highlighted in the review from as early as the initial islet tissue transplantation in 1893, ongoing efforts to improve the procedure efficacy and success are also explored. Progress in identifying unlimited cell sources, more favourable transplant sites, and novel drug delivery strategies all work to broaden ITx application and reduce adverse outcomes. Exploring combination of these approaches may uncover synergies that can further advance the field of ITx in providing sustainable functional cures. Finally, the potential of biomaterial strategies to facilitate immune evasion and local immune modulation are featured and may underpin successful application in alternative transplant sites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".