MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403983537 · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae479

Auditory processing up to cortex is maintained during sleep spindles

2024· article· en· W4403983537 on OpenAlexafffund
Hugo R. Jourde, Emily B. J. Coffey

Bibliographic record

VenuePNAS Nexus · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSleep and Wakefulness Research
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalConcordia UniversityMcGill UniversityInternational Laboratory for Brain, Music and Sound ResearchCentre for Research on Brain Language and Music
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSleep spindleMagnetoencephalographyNeuroscienceMemory consolidationThalamusAuditory cortexSensory gatingSleep (system call)PsychologyElectroencephalographyNon-rapid eye movement sleepGatingComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sleep spindles are transient 11-16 Hz brain oscillations generated by thalamocortical circuits. Their role in memory consolidation is well established, but how they play a role in sleep continuity and protection of memory consolidation against interference is unclear. One theory posits that spindles or a neural refractory period following their offset act as a gating mechanism, blocking sensory information en route to the cortex at the level of the thalamus. An alternative model posits that spindles do not participate in the suppression of neural responses to sound, although they can be produced in response to sound. We present evidence from three experiments using electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography in humans that examine different evoked responses in the presence of and following sleep spindles. The results provide convergent empirical evidence suggesting that auditory processing up to cortex is maintained during sleep spindles, and their refractory periods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePNAS NexusSame topicSleep and Wakefulness ResearchFrench-language works237,207