Imaging and clinical manifestations of hematogenous dissemination in melioidosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although there is a high incidence of hematogenous infections in melioidosis, a tropical infectious disease, there are few systematic analyses of hematogenous melioidosis in imaging articles. A comprehensive clinical and imaging evaluation of hematogenous melioidosis be conducted in order to achieve early diagnosis of the disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted an analysis of 111 cases of melioidosis diagnosed by bacteriological culture between August 2001 and September 2022. The analysis focused on observing the main manifestations of chest imaging and clinical data, including nodules, cavities, consolidation, ground glass opacity(GGO), pleural effusion, centrilobular nodules, and temperature, leucocyte count, diabetes, etc. Our study involved univariate and multivariate analyses to identify significant diagnostic variables and risk predictive factors. RESULTS: A total of 71.2% (79/111) of melioidosis cases were caused by hematogenous infection, and the most common organ involved was the lungs (88.5%, 100/113). The incidence of sepsis in patients with lung abnormalities was high (73%, 73/100), and the mortality rate of septic shock was 22% (22/100). Univariate analysis showed that the radiologic signs of blood culture-positive cases were more likely to have bilateral pulmonary and subpleural nodules (p = 0.003), bilateral GGO (p = 0.001), bilateral hydrothorax (p = 0.011). The multivariate analysis revealed a significant improvement in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) when comparing the model that included both clinical and radiologic variables to the model with clinical variables alone. The AUC increased from 0.818 to 0.932 (p = 0.012). The most important variables in the logistic regression with backward elimination were found to be nodule, GGO, and diabetes. CONCLUSION: The combination of CT features and clinical variables provided a valuable and timely warning for blood borne infectious melioidosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".