Dexamethasone regime and clinical outcomes in children hospitalized with croup: A cohort study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High-quality trial evidence supports the use of one dose of dexamethasone in the outpatient management of croup; however, there are no inpatient trials, and the optimal treatment regimen for the inpatient management of croup remains uncertain. Significant practice variability exists in the corticosteroid treatment of children hospitalized for croup. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of dexamethasone treatment regimen (1 vs. >1 dose) with hospital length of stay (LOS) and 30-day return to emergency department (ED) visits among children hospitalized for croup. METHODS: A cohort study of children hospitalized for croup at a children's hospital between 2010 and 2022. Children less than 10 years old, without known airway anomalies and who received dexamethasone for croup treatment were included. Children who received 1 dose versus >1 dose of dexamethasone were compared. Propensity score analyses, using inverse probability of treatment weighting, were conducted to estimate the treatment effects of dexamethasone regimen on hospital LOS and all-cause 30-day return to ED visit. RESULTS: Of 471 children hospitalized for croup, 229 (49%) received 1 dose of dexamethasone; 242 (51%) received >1 dose. In the propensity-weighted analyses, children receiving >1 dose of dexamethasone had a longer mean LOS by 59.6 h (95% CI 44.8-74.5, p < .001) compared with those receiving >1 dose. There was no statistically significant difference in the odds of all-cause 30-day return to ED visit; OR 1.30, (95% CI 0.76-2.22, p = .33). CONCLUSIONS: Among children hospitalized for croup, children who received >1 dose of dexamethasone had a longer LOS compared with children who received 1 dose of dexamethasone; however, there was no statistically significant difference in the 30-day return to ED visits. Randomized clinical trials are needed to determine the optimal dexamethasone treatment regimen for children hospitalized with croup.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".