Deep learning model for diagnosis of thyroid nodules with size less than 1 cm: A multicenter, retrospective study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To develop a ultrasound images based dual-channel deep learning model to achieve accurate early diagnosis of thyroid nodules less than 1 cm. Methods: A dual-channel deep learning model called thyroid nodule transformer network (TNT-Net) was proposed. The model has two input channels for transverse and longitudinal ultrasound images of thyroid nodules, respectively. A total of 9649 nodules from 8455 patients across five hospitals were retrospectively collected. The data were divided into a training set (8453 nodules, 7369 patients), an internal test set (565 nodules, 512 patients), and an external test set (631 nodules, 574 patients). Results: TNT-Net achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.953 (95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.934, 0.969) on the internal test set and 0.941 (95 % CI: 0.921, 0.957) on the external test set, significantly outperforming traditional deep convolutional neural network models and single-channel swin transformer model, whose AUCs ranged from 0.800 (95 % CI: 0.759, 0.837) to 0.856 (95 % CI: 0.819, 0.881). Furthermore, feature heatmap visualization showed that TNT-Net could extract richer and more energetic malignant nodule patterns. Conclusion: The proposed TNT-Net model significantly improved the recognition capability for thyroid nodules with size less than 1 cm. This model has the potential to reduce overdiagnosis and overtreatment of such nodules, providing essential support for precise management of thyroid nodules while complementing fine-needle aspiration biopsy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".