MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403988416 · doi:10.1080/08123985.2024.2398156

The magnetic gradient tensor of a right circular cylinder: theoretical considerations in the determination of magnetisation direction

2024· article· en· W4403988416 on OpenAlexaffabout
K. Blair McKenzie, S. M. Hansen, Janet Morrissey

Bibliographic record

VenueExploration Geophysics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsRio Tinto (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetizationCylinderTensor (intrinsic definition)GeologyPhysicsGeophysicsGeometryMagnetic fieldMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the use of the magnetic gradient tensor and its eigenvectors to derive expressions for estimating the direction of magnetisation of a uniformly magnetised right circular vertical cylinder. Expressions for the gradient tensor, the eigenvalues and eigenvectors, the normalised source strength (NSS), and the direction of magnetisation on the axis of a vertical cylinder are shown to be identical in form to those previously derived for a magnetised sphere or dipole. However, the off-axis gradient tensor field of a vertical cylinder is significantly different to that of a magnetic sphere or dipole particularly at low observation heights. These differences lessen with increasing observation height and in more compact pipes. The normalised source strength displays a directional asymmetry in the eigenvector field of the gradient tensor above a pipe which is related to the direction of magnetisation. This azimuthal asymmetry in the NSS results exclusively from the horizontal components of magnetisation, which are perpendicular to the longitudinal face of the vertical cylinder. In contrast, the vertical component of magnetisation is normal to the circular planar face and produces radial symmetry in the NSS. Additionally, the paper details some unusual properties of the NSS which are attributable to non-dipole field components in the gradient tensor field which cause pairs of eigenvectors to interchange directions when ordered by their eigenvalues, as is done when calculating the NSS. This results in spatial discontinuities in the eigenvector fields arising from crossovers in the ordered eigenvalue surfaces which vary with both magnetisation direction and observation height. This phenomenon is not present in a dipole field and thus provides direct evidence of non-dipole field components. Understanding this complexity in the eigenvector field is essential to designing methodologies which can successfully estimate the direction of magnetisation over a uniformly magnetised cylinder. One proposed method based on the peak NSS, uses airborne gradient tensor data to accurately estimate magnetisation direction over a reversely magnetised pipe-like body in the Diavik diamond field of north-western Canada. The results are verified using a full tensor inversion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExploration GeophysicsSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207