Dynamic analysis of malicious behavior propagation based on feature selection in software network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the era of big data, the propagation of malicious software poses a significant threat to corporate data security. To safeguard data assets from the encroachment of malware, it is essential to conduct a dynamic analysis of various information propagation behaviors within software. This paper introduces a dynamic analysis detection method for malicious behavior based on feature extraction (MBDFE), designed to effectively identify and thwart the spread of malicious software. The method is divided into three stages: First, variable-length N-gram algorithms are utilized to extract subsequences of varying lengths from the sample APl call sequences as continuous dynamic features. Second, feature selection techniques based on information gain are employed to identify suitable classification features. Lastly, recurrent neural networks (RNN) are applied for the classification training and prediction of diverse software behaviors. Experimental results and analysis demonstrate that this approach can accurately detect and promptly interrupt the information dissemination of malicious software when such behavior occurs, thereby enhancing the precision and timeliness of malware detection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".