MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4403992060 · doi:10.1101/2024.11.01.619946

Context-dependent NMDA receptor dysfunction predicts seizure treatment in mice with human GluN1 variant

2024· preprint· en· W4403992060 on OpenAlexaff
Sridevi Venkatesan, Daria Nazarkina, Megan T. Sullivan, Yao‐Fang Tan, Sarah Qu, Amy J. Ramsey, Evelyn K. Lambe

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNMDA receptorContext (archaeology)NeuroscienceReceptorMedicinePsychologyBiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Mutations in N-Methyl D-Aspartate receptors (NMDARs) cause epilepsy and profound cognitive impairment, though the underlying subunit-specific vulnerabilities remain unclear. We investigate the impact of a severe human variant in the lurcher motif of obligate GluN1 NMDAR subunit using transgenic mice, leveraging context-specific dysfunction to devise a surprising treatment. We show that the GluN1 Y647S variant significantly reduces current flow through isolated NMDARs in the mouse brain. However, this loss-of-function paradoxically extends NMDAR-dependent dendritic integration, causing prolonged circuit-wide excitation that promotes seizures. Mutant receptors fail to sufficiently engage opposing dendritic ion channels that normally prevent NMDAR overactivation. Boosting negative feedback restores normal dendritic integration and successfully treats seizures in vivo, despite loss-of-function of isolated NMDARs. We demonstrate how seizures arise from loss-of-function NMDARs and target the interaction between a GluN1 variant’s receptor-level effects and its dendritic environment to treat them effectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research→French-language works237,207→