Foundations, Design, and Integration of Customer Relationship Management (CRM) Systems Within Corporate Knowledge Management Strategies
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In highly competitive markets, companies need to secure their long-term viability by establishing and maintaining competitive advantages using Customer Relationship Management (CRM) systems. The way these systems are designed significantly impacts a corporation's future growth and profitability and should be recognized as a key factor in the success of corporate knowledge management. This paper aims to identify the design features and prerequisites of CRM systems that contribute to increased sales, the expansion of corporate knowledge, and overall organizational development. An empirical study conducted in 2019 within the Austrian packaging industry (Moser, 2021) highlights the importance of identifying CRM system requirements that enhance user acceptance. The design criteria identified can guide the implementation of future CRM projects, ensuring proper use and approval, and contribute to the development of a comprehensive CRM strategy that integrates corporate knowledge management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it