MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4403996806 · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106068

Techno-authoritarianism & copyright issues of user-generated content on social- media

2024· article· en· W4403996806 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmed Ragib Chowdhury

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer law & security review · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicLaw, AI, and Intellectual Property
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAuthoritarianismSocial mediaContent (measure theory)Internet privacyComputer scienceUser-generated contentBusinessPolitical scienceWorld Wide WebLawDemocracyMathematicsPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lawrence Lessig in his book "Code: Version 2.0" presents "code" as the new law and regulator of cyberspace. The influence of code as the new regulator can be seen from the shift in the definition of techno-authoritarianism from state use of information technology to administer digital authoritarianism to corporation sponsored digital imperialism. This corporation sponsored imperialism has widespread implications for users’ rights including the copyright related rights concerning user-generated content on social media platforms. This paper will doctrinally assess the impact of the "terms of use" of social media platforms has on user-generated content from a copyright law perspective. It will also consider whether these terms of use are enforceable from a contract law perspective.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.020
Scholarly communication0.0110.010
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0070.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputer law & security review→Same topicLaw, AI, and Intellectual Property→French-language works237,207→