A protocol for trustworthy EEG decoding with neural networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deep learning solutions have rapidly emerged for EEG decoding, achieving state-of-the-art performance on a variety of decoding tasks. Despite their high performance, existing solutions do not fully address the challenge posed by the introduction of many hyperparameters, defining data pre-processing, network architecture, network training, and data augmentation. Automatic hyperparameter search is rarely performed and limited to network-related hyperparameters. Moreover, pipelines are highly sensitive to performance fluctuations due to random initialization, hindering their reliability. Here, we design a comprehensive protocol for EEG decoding that explores the hyperparameters characterizing the entire pipeline and that includes multi-seed initialization for providing robust performance estimates. Our protocol is validated on 9 datasets about motor imagery, P300, SSVEP, including 204 participants and 26 recording sessions, and on different deep learning models. We accompany our protocol with extensive experiments on the main aspects influencing it, such as the number of participants used for hyperparameter search, the split into sequential simpler searches (multi-step search), the use of informed vs. non-informed search algorithms, and the number of random seeds for obtaining stable performance. The best protocol included 2-step hyperparameter search via an informed search algorithm, with the final training and evaluation performed using 10 random initializations. The optimal trade-off between performance and computational time was achieved by using a subset of 3-5 participants for hyperparameter search. Our protocol consistently outperformed baseline state-of-the-art pipelines, widely across datasets and models, and could represent a standard approach for neuroscientists for decoding EEG in a trustworthy and reliable way.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.048 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.040 | 0.022 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".