Windows of susceptibility and joint effects of prenatal and postnatal ambient air pollution and temperature exposure on asthma and wheeze in Mexican children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Prenatal and early-life exposure to air pollution and extreme temperatures are associated with childhood asthma and wheeze. However, potential windows of susceptibility and their sex-specific and interactive effects have not been fully elucidated. We aimed to identify critical windows of susceptibility and evaluate sex-specific effects in these associations, and evaluate exposure interactions. METHODS: , and temperature were generated from our validated spatiotemporally resolved models from conception to age 4 years. Childhood asthma and wheeze outcomes were collected at 4-6 and 7-8 years. Distributed lag nonlinear models (DLNMs) were used to identify susceptible windows for prenatal weekly-specific and postnatal monthly-specific associations of air pollution and temperature with respiratory outcomes adjusting for covariates. To evaluate sex-specific effects, DLNMs were stratified. Joint effects were assessed using relative excess risk due to interaction and attributable proportion. RESULTS: and high temperature exposure during the first year of life, associated with higher odds of current wheeze. The associations of prenatal air pollution and temperature exposure with respiratory outcomes were more pronounced in males. CONCLUSIONS: Early-life air pollution exposure contributes to the development of childhood asthma and wheeze, while exposure to temperature showed mixed associations with respiratory outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".