MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403998080 · doi:10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100719

Diversity and availability of edible caterpillar host plants in the Luki biosphere reserve landscape in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

2024· article· en· W4403998080 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueTrees Forests and People · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect Utilization and Effects
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEuropean CommissionWorld Wildlife Fund
KeywordsBiosphereDiversity (politics)DemocracyNature reserveHost (biology)CaterpillarGeographyEcologyAgroforestryBiologyPolitical sciencePoliticsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Edible caterpillars are an important food and economic resource for rural African people. However, they are subject to a number of threats; in particular, their host plants are threatened. The Luki Biosphere Reserve landscape is a region of the Democratic Republic of Congo where the practice of eating caterpillars is a recent phenomenon; however, rural communities have reported their scarcity. This study assessed the diversity and availability of host plants of the edible caterpillars in the Luki Biosphere Reserve (LBR) landscape. Botanical inventories were conducted in eleven ha plots of each of the following habitats: forest, savannah under protection, fallow, and inhabited areas, covering an area of 44 ha. The coverage-based rarefaction and extrapolation method and the iNEXT online software were used to calculate the true diversity of edible caterpillar host plants. The diameter structure of the edible caterpillar host plant species was assessed by counting the number of individuals in each diameter class. The results revealed that in the Luki Biosphere Reserve landscape, edible caterpillars rely on 15 main plant host species ( Spondias mombin L., Petersianthus macrocarpus (P.Beauv.) Liben, Croton sylvaticus Hochst. ex Krauss, Hymenocardia acida Tul., Lannea welwitschii (Hiern) Engl., Macaranga spinosa Müll.Arg., Celtis mildbraedii Engl., Coelocaryon botryoïdes Vermoesen, Albizia gummifera (J.F.Gmel.) C. A. Sm, Bridelia atroviridis Müll.Arg , Ficus mucuso Welw. ex Ficalho, Funtumia elastica (P.Preuss) Stapf, Lannea welwitschii (Hiern) Engl ., Milicia excelsa (Welw.) C.C. Berg., and Terminalia superba Engl. & Diels). The habitats exhibited low species diversity of the edible caterpillar host plants. Moreover, several of these species are becoming scarce or are locally threatened with extinction. The trend in the diametric structure is similar to species evolving in a disturbed environment.The results of this study suggest potential habitat instability linked to human activities that could lead to biodiversity loss and, thus, a decline in edible caterpillars in the LBR landscape. A better understanding of the unfavourable conditions that influence the nutritional support for the edible caterpillars would help promote appropriate strategies that can be applied in local development plans for community lands at a landscape scale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score0.802

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it