A quantitative intracellular peptide binding assay reveals recognition determinants and context dependence of short linear motifs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transient protein-protein interactions play key roles in controlling dynamic cellular responses. Many examples involve globular protein domains that bind to peptide sequences known as Short Linear Motifs (SLiMs), which are enriched in intrinsically disordered regions of proteins. Here we describe a novel functional assay for measuring SLiM binding, called Systematic Intracellular Motif Binding Analysis (SIMBA). In this method, binding of a foreign globular domain to its cognate SLiM peptide allows yeast cells to proliferate by blocking a growth arrest signal. A high-throughput application of the SIMBA method involving competitive growth and deep sequencing provides rapid quantification of the relative binding strength for thousands of SLiM sequence variants, and a comprehensive interrogation of SLiM sequence features that control their recognition and potency. We show that multiple distinct classes of SLiM-binding domains can be analyzed by this method, and that the relative binding strength of peptides in vivo correlates with their biochemical affinities measured in vitro. Deep mutational scanning provides high-resolution definitions of motif recognition determinants and reveals how sequence variations at non-core positions can modulate binding strength. Furthermore, mutational scanning of multiple parent peptides that bind human tankyrase ARC or YAP WW domains identifies distinct binding modes and uncovers context effects in which the preferred residues at one position depend on residues elsewhere. The findings establish SIMBA as a fast and incisive approach for interrogating SLiM recognition via massively parallel quantification of protein-peptide binding strength in vivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".