Artificial Intelligence Associated Drones Solutions for Waste Disposal Management in the Process Industries
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The paper aims to provide an overview of "Waste Management Solution," an Artificial Intelligence computer vision solution that can detect the location, classify, and quantify waste on a geospatial map constructed by aerial images collected with drones. The objective is to demonstrate how drones with integrated AI solutions can drive efficiency, productivity, and innovation in industrial operations. The solution comprises drones collecting aerial image data and implementing cloud-based AI/Machine learning (ML) models to detect waste materials. By integrating drone technology, AI, and mapping techniques, the solution supports industrial organizations, government authorities, and environmental agencies in achieving their net-zero goals, aligned with the Saudi Green Initiative 2030, and aiming to create a cleaner environment. The solution offers a cost-effective method for processing industries facilities and the environmental and urban planning of smart cities by digitizing waste management practices, replacing time-consuming manual industrial waste inspections. The benefits of the solution are demonstrated through our experience of an actual project conducted with the project management office of a large oil and gas operating company.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it