Application of a Multi-Spectral UAV Imagery in Germplasm Characterization: Prediction of Forage Biomass and Growth Patterns of Cicer Milkvetch (Astragalus cicer L.) Populations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV)-based multi-spectral imaging could reduce the intensive labour required in phenotyping germplasm in crop breeding. The objectives of this study were to examine if UAV-based imaging could differentiate cicer milkvetch (Astragalus cicer L.) germplasm and identify UAV-based vegetation indices with correlations to its dry matter yield (DMY). A spaced nursery from 27 cicer milkvetch populations was established near Saskatoon, SK, Canada, in 2019. From 1 June to 15 October in 2020 and 2021, phenotypic traits including maximum stem length, leaf number per stem, rhizome spread rate, and stem density, along with two UAV-measured traits, green area and canopy volume, were measured bi-weekly. Forage DMY was determined in late June and mid-October of each year. In this study, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) green area and NDVI canopy volume data differentiated the three selected populations. NDVI green area had the highest correlation with forage DMY among the traits (June harvest: r = 0.91, October harvest: r = 0.77). Among measured phenotypic traits, maximum stem length had the highest correlation with forage DMY (June harvest: r = 0.74, October harvest: r = 0.83), which was significantly correlated to NDVI green area. The results indicated potential use of UAV-phenotyping in single plant evaluation in plant breeding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".