Developing PDE-constrained optimal control of multicomponent contamination flows in porous media
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper develops a robust and efficient PDE-constrained optimal control model for multicomponent pollutions in porous media, which takes into account nonlinear multi-component contamination flows of groundwater. The objective of the pollution optimal control is to identify the optimal injection rates from the top part boundary of domain, which can minimize the least squares error between the concentrations that are simulated and the allowable observed concentrations at observation sites, combining with the affection of costs associated with reducing emissions at injection locations. To discrete the constrained governing system of nonlinear multi-component flows, the splitting improved upwind finite difference scheme is developed for multicomponent PDEs system involving nonlinear chemical reactions of multicomponent pollutants and the pollutant injected rates on the upper part boundary. We employ the differential evolution (DE) optimization algorithm to solve the optimization. We numerically demonstrate the effectiveness of our model by analyzing the flow simulation on a simple geometric aquifer and identifying the optimal injection rates by minimizing the concentration derivation and the abatement costs. We also investigate the simulation of the contamination flow in a more realistic-shaped aquifer, which further validates our model's robustness and efficacy. The developed PDE-constrained control model and algorithm can be applied to applications of groundwater pollution control.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".