MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404024935 · doi:10.22215/cujs.v3i1.4925

Does MATmatics Work? Impact of Early Numeracy Intervention on Students’ Math Skills

2024· article· en· W4404024935 on OpenAlexaff
Heather Douglas, Rebecca Merkley, Jo‐Anne LeFevre

Bibliographic record

VenueCarleton undergraduate journal of science. · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Canadian institutionsNorthwestern PolytechnicCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNumeracyMathematics educationIntervention (counseling)Work (physics)PsychologyMedical educationPedagogyMedicineLiteracyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Early knowledge of numbers, relations, and operations are foundations for student success. Weak foundational number skills can lead to later difficulties, thus early identification and targeted interventions for students with weak number skills can help stop them from falling further behind. In the current study, we tested the effectiveness of MATmatics, a tier 2 intervention that targeted early numeracy skills for at-risk students in grades 2 and 3. Students (N = 45) were quasi-randomly assigned to either an intervention group, or a wait-listed control group. Using a series of 2 (group: intervention, control) x 2 (test timing: pre-intervention, post-intervention) mixed ANOVAS, we found that the math skills (measured with the Early Math Assessment@School numeracy screener) of students assigned to the intervention group improved at a faster rate than the math skills of their waitlisted control peers. The intervention was effective.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.204
Threshold uncertainty score0.608

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.387 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCarleton undergraduate journal of science.Same topicMathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesFrench-language works237,207