Did I Meet My Expectations? Exploring Whether Teen College Expectations Predict Degree Attainment and Mental Health
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the predictive power of teen college expectations on future degree attainment and mental health outcomes. It also explores the role of personality traits in this process. The data are from a sample of 8,984 U.S. residents who participated in the National Longitudinal Study of Youth – 1997 Cohort (NLSY97). Teens reported on their college expectations through self-reported measures in 1997 or 2001. In subsequent surveys (2008 onward), participants reported on their degree attainment, mental health, and personality traits. Individuals with high college expectations compared to individuals with low college expectations had a more positive personality trait profile and better mental health outcomes. When comparing people who met their expectations with people who did not meet their expectations, there were few differences in mental health. There were no significant interactions between college expectations and degree attainment, controlling for ability, socioeconomic status, and gender.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".