MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404025140 · doi:10.22215/cujs.v3i1.4927

Exploring School Absenteeism: Reasons Why, Mental Health Profiles, and Parental Involvement Perspectives

2024· article· en· W4404025140 on OpenAlexaffabout
A Darby, Amanda Krause, Maria Rogers

Bibliographic record

VenueCarleton undergraduate journal of science. · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicYouth Substance Use and School Attendance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbsenteeismMental healthPsychologyDevelopmental psychologyClinical psychologyEnvironmental healthMedicinePsychiatrySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigated school absenteeism among a sample of Canadian students (N = 88), links with mental health (ADHD, ADHD with depressive symptoms, and neither), and parents’ school involvement beliefs. Reasons as to why students with different mental health profiles missed school were also explored. As part of a larger longitudinal study, parent informants completed an online questionnaire about school absenteeism, mental health, and parent beliefs. The average number of school days missed in the past two weeks was 2.21 for students with both ADHD and depressive symptoms, 1.86 for those with neither, and 1.52 for those with only ADHD. Reasons for school absenteeism differed across groups and the main effect of mental health profile was significant when parent beliefs regarding school involvement were controlled for. These findings highlight features of school absenteeism following the COVID-19 pandemic, illustrating the importance of mental health profiles and parental school involvement beliefs when investigating school absenteeism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.362
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCarleton undergraduate journal of science.Same topicYouth Substance Use and School AttendanceFrench-language works237,207