MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404027502 · doi:10.5539/jas.v16n12p17

White Bean and Weed Desiccation With Pelargonic Acid

2024· article· en· W4404027502 on OpenAlexfundvenueaboutno aff
Nader Soltani, Christian Willemse, Peter H. Sikkema

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant responses to water stress
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Agriculture, Food and Rural AffairsOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
KeywordsWhite (mutation)DesiccationWeedBiologyAgronomyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Few studies have evaluated pelargonic acid for desiccating white bean and annual weeds. Five field experiments were conducted from 2021 to 2023 near Exeter and Ridgetown, Ontario, Canada to assess pelargonic acid applied alone or sequentially at different rates and several alternative herbicides for desiccating white bean and annual weeds. Pelargonic acid applied at 3400 g ai ha-1 desiccated white bean 88, 92, and 98% at 5, 8, and 14 days after application (DAA), respectively. Increasing the application rate, using sequential application, or adding 28% urea ammonium nitrate (UAN), did not improve white bean desiccation. Pelargonic acid applied at 3400 g ai ha-1 desiccated green pigweed 0, 2, and 1%; common ragweed 4, 3, and 3%; common lambsquarters 0, 0, and 0%; green foxtail 8, 12, and 15%; and barnyardgrass 5, 5, and 4% at 5, 8, and 14 DAA, respectively. Increasing the application rate, using sequential applications, or adding 28% UAN did not improve overall weed desiccation, except for green foxtail where desiccation was enhanced 14, 14, and 15% with pelargonic acid applied at 6800 g ai ha-1 at 5, 8, and 14 DAA, respectively and common ragweed where desiccation was increased 5% with pelargonic acid applied at 6800 g ai ha-1 at 8 DAA. At 14 DAA, green pigweed, common ragweed, common lambsquarters, green foxtail and barnyardgrass desiccation with carfentrazone-ethyl was 30, 6, 0, 11, and 7%; with ammonium salt of fatty acid was with 60, 12, 0, 59, and 36%; with flumioxazin was 54, 68, 31, 90, and 69%; with saflufenacil was 100, 96, 75, 37, and 55%; with tiafenacil was 100, 88, 5, 80, and 42%; with glufosinate was 100, 95, 100, 99, and 96%; and with diquat was 100, 99, 99, 99, and 96%, respectively. Dry bean desiccation with ammonium salt of fatty acid, glufosinate, carfentrazone-ethyl, flumioxazin, saflufenacil, tiafenacil, and diquat was 98-99% at 14 DAA. Among the desiccants evaluated, diquat and glufosinate were the most effective with 99% white bean desiccation and 95-100% desiccation of annual weeds at 14 DAA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicPlant responses to water stressFrench-language works237,207