MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Size-Adaptive 24-Channel Prefrontal Cortex RF Coil Array for 3T MRI

2024· article· en· W4404037030 on OpenAlexaff
William Mathieu, Milica Popović, Reza Farivar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrefrontal cortexElectromagnetic coilChannel (broadcasting)Radio frequencyComputer sciencePsychologyNeuroscienceNuclear magnetic resonanceMaterials scienceElectrical engineeringPhysicsTelecommunicationsEngineeringCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Flexible, anatomically adapted RF coils can offer improved image quality and patient experience. A semi-flexible, patient size-adaptable 24-channel coil array was constructed to specifically cover the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Elements were constructed on 3-D printed TPU substrate, which allows for sufficient controlled flexibility to fit varied head shapes while preserving array stability. Our 24-channel frontal cortex array demonstrated higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at cortical depths and lower average channel noise, when compared to a similar 24-channel product coil. The proposed array promises to improve PFC imaging, which may have significant impact on the study and treatment of diseases and disorders associated with the PFC. Finally, our results strongly suggest that the here-presented design approach with semi-flexible plates, if adopted for the entire head, can lead to significant improvements in the overall cortical imaging at 3 tesla (T) MRI fields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications→French-language works237,207→