MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404039394 · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2024.08.068

A Guide to Implementation Science for Phase 3 Clinical Trialists

2024· review· en· W4404039394 on OpenAlexafffund
Harriette G.C. Van Spall, Laura Desveaux, Tracy Finch, Cara C. Lewis, George A. Mensah, Yves Rosenberg, Kavita Singh, François Venter, Bryan J. Weiner, Faı̈ez Zannad

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American College of Cardiology · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth Policy Implementation Science
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Work & HealthSt. Joseph’s Healthcare HamiltonTrillium Health CentreMcMaster UniversityPopulation Health Research Institute
FundersMedical Research CouncilCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchServierNovo NordiskAcceleronMylanBill and Melinda Gates FoundationViiV HealthcareChildren's Investment Fund FoundationNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteHeart and Stroke Foundation of CanadaPfizerBristol-Myers SquibbSanofiGilead SciencesNational Institutes of HealthUnited States Agency for International Development
KeywordsGeneralizability theoryMedicineClinical trialSoftware deploymentIntervention (counseling)Process managementManagement scienceMedical physicsRisk analysis (engineering)NursingComputer scienceSoftware engineeringPathologyPsychologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.169
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.351
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score0.896

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1690.351
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.011
Bibliometrics0.0140.011
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0130.009
Open science0.0090.008
Research integrity0.0150.029
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0480.028

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.686
GPT teacher head0.788
Teacher spread0.103 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American College of CardiologySame topicHealth Policy Implementation ScienceFrench-language works237,207