Essai poético-philosophique sur l’infinitisation de la mort chez Piranèse (1720-1778) : expérience des ruines et traversée des temporalités, archéologie de l’eau-forte et fondement de la perception
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cet essai, nous voyons comment l’expérience des ruines et l’imaginaire des prisons conduisent le graveur/architecte Giovanni Battista Piranesi (1720-1778) à explorer plusieurs registres de temporalité, à s’engager dans une recherche d’origine, une exploration de la mémoire et une méditation sur la mort. Les mausolées étrusques, les columbariums romains sont des métaphores pour parler de nos édifices conceptuels et des bas-fonds de la psyché. L’eau-forte interroge l’ordre symbolique d’une époque quand ce médium devient l’analogon de celle-ci, le dispositif d’inscription dans lequel se donne une épaisseur du monde. Par des exercices de perdition et de sublimation, de discontinuité et de répétition, l’artiste trouve en lui-même le principe de sa continuité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".