MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404040119 · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-24-2248

FOXR2 Targets LHX6+/DLX+ Neural Lineages to Drive Central Nervous System Neuroblastoma

2024· article· en· W4404040119 on OpenAlexafffund
Selin Jessa, Antonella De Cola, Bhavyaa Chandarana, Michael McNicholas, Steven Hébert, Adam Ptack, Damien Faury, Jessica W. Tsai, Andrey Korshunov, Timothy N. Phoenix, Benjamin Ellezam, David Jones, Michael D. Taylor, Pratiti Bandopadhayay, Manav Pathania, Nada Jabado, Claudia L. Kleinman

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroblastoma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMontreal Children's HospitalHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineMcGill Genome CentreMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health CentreMcGill-Queen's University PressJewish General Hospital
FundersCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of CambridgeLady Davis Institute for Medical ResearchFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéFaculty of Medicine, McGill UniversityNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFondation Charles-BruneauNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeGreat Ormond Street Hospital CharityCancer Research UKAlex's Lemonade Stand Foundation for Childhood CancerBrain Research UKRally FoundationCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchGenome CanadaSt. Baldrick's Foundation
KeywordsGanglionic eminenceBiologyNeural stem cellNeuroscienceCerebrumProgenitor cellFate mappingGliogenesisTranscription factorCarcinogenesisProgenitorChromatinCentral nervous systemStem cellCell biologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Central nervous system neuroblastoma with forkhead box R2 (FOXR2) activation (NB-FOXR2) is a high-grade tumor of the brain hemispheres and a newly identified molecular entity. Tumors express dual neuronal and glial markers, leading to frequent misdiagnoses, and limited information exists on the role of FOXR2 in their genesis. To identify their cellular origins, we profiled the transcriptomes of NB-FOXR2 tumors at the bulk and single-cell levels and integrated these profiles with large single-cell references of the normal brain. NB-FOXR2 tumors mapped to LHX6+/DLX+ lineages derived from the medial ganglionic eminence, a progenitor domain in the ventral telencephalon. In vivo prenatal Foxr2 targeting to the ganglionic eminences in mice induced postnatal cortical tumors recapitulating human NB-FOXR2-specific molecular signatures. Profiling of FOXR2 binding on chromatin in murine models revealed an association with ETS transcriptional networks, as well as direct binding of FOXR2 at key transcription factors that coordinate initiation of gliogenesis. These data indicate that NB-FOXR2 tumors originate from LHX6+/DLX+ interneuron lineages, a lineage of origin distinct from that of other FOXR2-driven brain tumors, highlight the susceptibility of ventral telencephalon-derived interneurons to FOXR2-driven oncogenesis, and suggest that FOXR2-induced activation of glial programs may explain the mixed neuronal and oligodendroglial features in these tumors. More broadly, this work underscores systematic profiling of brain development as an efficient approach to orient oncogenic targeting for in vivo modeling, critical for the study of rare tumors and development of therapeutics. Significance: Profiling the developing brain enabled rationally guided modeling of FOXR2-activated CNS neuroblastoma, providing a strategy to overcome the heterogeneous origins of pediatric brain tumors that hamper tumor modeling and therapy development. See related commentary by Orr, p. 195.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicNeuroblastoma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207