MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PP124 Topic: AS13–Hematology/Oncology/Stem Cell Transplant/Immunology: ARE EXISTING MORTALITY PREDICTION MODELS SUITABLE FOR PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY/ONCOLOGY PATIENTS ADMITTED TO THE PEDIATRIC INTENSIVE CARE UNIT DUE TO SEPSIS?

2024· article· en· W4404041705 on OpenAlexaff
Talya Wittmann Dayagi, Ronit Nirel, Galia Avrahami, Shirah Amar, Sarah Elitzur, Shani Fisher, Gil Gilead, Oded Gilad, Tracie Goldberg, Shai Izraeli, Gili Kadmon, Eytan Kaplan, Aviva C. Krauss, Orli Michaeli, Jerry Stein, Orna Steinberg‐Shemer, Hannah Tamary, Osnat Tausky, Helen Toledano, Avichai Weissbach, Joanne Yacobovich, A. Yanir, J. B. A. van Zon, Elhanan Nahum, S. Barzilai-Birenboim

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Critical Care Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHematological disorders and diagnostics
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHematologySepsisInternal medicinePediatric oncologyIntensive care medicineOncologyIntensive care unitCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims & Objectives: Children with hemato-oncological diseases or post-stem cell transplantation (SCT), are highly susceptible to life-threatening infections, constituting a significant portion of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admissions due to sepsis. Standard pediatric prognostic tools may not adequately assess illness severity and mortality risk in this subgroup. Our study aimed to assess the suitability of the Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 (PELOD-2) and the Pediatric Risk of Mortality III (PRISM III) scores in this context and develop a tailored risk-assessment model for these vulnerable patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study, at the largest referral pediatric hematology-oncology center in Israel. We collected and analyzed demographics, clinical and laboratory data, and PICU outcomes from all admissions to the PICU due to sepsis of children with hemato-oncological diseases or after SCT, between 2008-2021 (n=233). Results: The survival rate was 83%. The diagnostic capabilities of PELOD-2 and PRISM III, as determined by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), were 82% and 74%, respectively. Models including the existing scoring tools and 9 new clinical parameters (age, SCT, viral or fungal infection, central venous line removal, vasoactive inotropic score, bilirubin, C-reactive protein level, and prolonged neutropenia) significantly improved the above AUCs to 90% (p=0.01) and 87% (p<0.001), respectively. Conclusions: PELOD-2 and PRISM III scores show limited diagnostic accuracy in hemato-oncological children admitted to the PICU with sepsis. Our findings underscore the necessity for a specialized risk-assessment tool, reflective of their distinct features, to be validated in a large multi-center prospective study. Keywords: oncology, Sepsis, PELOD-2

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric Critical Care MedicineSame topicHematological disorders and diagnosticsFrench-language works237,207