MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PP015 Topic: AS01–Brain: Neuroimaging/Trauma/Monitoring/Status Epilepticus/CNS Infections/Other: PREDICTION OF GOOD NEUROLOGICAL OUTCOME AFTER RETURN OF CIRCULATION FOLLOWING PAEDIATRIC CARDIAC ARREST: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

2024· review· en· W4404042112 on OpenAlexaff
Barnaby R. Scholefield, Janice A. Tijssen, Saptharishi Lalgudi Ganesan, Mirjam Kool, Thomaz Bittencourt Couto, Alexis Topjian, Donita Atkins, Anne-Marie Guerguerian

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Critical Care Medicine · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStatus epilepticusMeta-analysisNeuroimagingIntensive care medicineReturn of spontaneous circulationSystematic reviewMEDLINEEpilepsyAnesthesiaInternal medicineResuscitationPsychiatryCardiopulmonary resuscitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims & Objectives: To assess the value of biomarkers, clinical examination, electrophysiology or neuroimaging, within 14 days from return of circulation, to predict good neurological outcome in children following cardiac arrest. Methods: Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched May 2023. Sensitivity and false positive rates (FPR) for good outcome (defined as no, mild, or moderate disability, or minimal change from baseline) were calculated for each predictor. Risk of bias was assessed using QUIPS tool. Results: Thirty-five studies involving 2974 children were included. The presence of any of the following had a FPR rate <30% for predicting good neurological outcome with moderate (50-75%) to high (>75%) sensitivity: bilateral reactive pupillary light response within 12h; motor component >4 on the Glasgow Coma Scale at 6h; bilateral somatosensory evoked potentials at 24-72h; electroencephalography (EEG) sleep spindles within 24h; a continuous EEG background within 24h; and a normal brain MRI at 4-6d. Early (≤12h) normal lactate levels (<2mmol/L) or normal s100b, NSE or MBP levels predicted good neurological outcomes with FPR rate <30% and low (<50%) sensitivity. All studies had moderate to high risk of bias with heterogeneity in terms of timing of measurement, definition of test, use of multi-modal tests, and outcome assessments. Conclusions: Select biomarkers, clinical examination, electrophysiology or neuroimaging as individual tests, can predict good neurological outcome after paediatric cardiac arrest; however, evidence is often of low quality and heterogeneous. Combination of tests should be studied and is likely of added value over using a single modality. Keywords: biomarkers, Paediatric Intensive Care, Prognostication, Cardiac Arrest, Systematic Review

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.015
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric Critical Care MedicineSame topicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlFrench-language works237,207