MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404044612 · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad79ec

TEMPLATES: Direct Abundance Constraints for Two Lensed Lyman-break Galaxies

2024· article· en· W4404044612 on OpenAlexaff
Brian Welch, Grace M. Olivier, Taylor A. Hutchison, Jane R. Rigby, Danielle A. Berg, Manuel Aravena, Matthew Bayliss, Jack E. Birkin, S. C. Chapman, Håkon Dahle, Michael D. Gladders, Gourav Khullar, Keunho Kim, Guillaume Mahler, Matthew A. Malkan, Desika Narayanan, Kedar A. Phadke, Keren Sharon, J. D. Smith, Manuel Solimano, Justin Spilker, J. D. Vieira, David Vizgan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstronomy and Astrophysical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaDalhousie UniversityHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
FundersGoddard Space Flight CenterSpace Telescope Science InstituteNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsGalaxyAbundance (ecology)AstronomyLuminous infrared galaxyGalaxy formation and evolutionDiscRadio galaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Using integrated spectra for two gravitationally lensed galaxies from the JWST TEMPLATES Early Release Science program, we analyze faint auroral lines, which provide direct measurements of the gas-phase chemical abundance. For the brighter galaxy, SGAS1723+34 ( z = 1.3293), we detect the [O iii ] λ 4363, [S iii ] λ 6312, and [O ii ] λ λ 7320, 7330 auroral emission lines, and set an upper limit for the [N ii ] λ 5755 line. For the second galaxy, SGAS1226+21 ( z = 2.925), we do not detect any auroral lines, and report upper limits. With these measurements and upper limits, we constrain the electron temperatures in different ionization zones within both of these galaxies. For SGAS1723+34, where auroral lines are detected, we calculate direct oxygen and nitrogen abundances, finding an N/O ratio consistent with observations of nearby ( z ∼ 0) galaxies. These observations highlight the potent combination of JWST and gravitational lensing to measure faint emission lines in individual distant galaxies and to directly study the chemical abundance patterns in those galaxies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.766
Threshold uncertainty score0.896

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchFrench-language works237,207