MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404046040 · doi:10.3390/mca29060100

Numerical Study of Multi-Term Time-Fractional Sub-Diffusion Equation Using Hybrid L1 Scheme with Quintic Hermite Splines

2024· article· en· W4404046040 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical and Computational Applications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFractional Differential Equations Solutions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHermite polynomialsQuintic functionTerm (time)Scheme (mathematics)MathematicsApplied mathematicsDiffusionMathematical analysisDiffusion equationPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anomalous diffusion of particles has been described by the time-fractional reaction–diffusion equation. A hybrid formulation of numerical technique is proposed to solve the time-fractional-order reaction–diffusion (FRD) equation numerically. The technique comprises the semi-discretization of the time variable using an L1 finite-difference scheme and space discretization using the quintic Hermite spline collocation method. The hybrid technique reduces the problem to an iterative scheme of an algebraic system of equations. The stability analysis of the proposed numerical scheme and the optimal error bounds for the approximate solution are also studied. A comparative study of the obtained results and an error analysis of approximation show the efficiency, accuracy, and effectiveness of the technique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.764
Threshold uncertainty score0.823

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it