MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

P137 Early reduction in respiratory readmissions following implementation of a hospital-based stop smoking service

2024· article· en· W4404046346 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A. K. Singh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReduction (mathematics)Respiratory systemComputer scienceService (business)Emergency medicineMedicineMedical emergencyBusinessInternal medicineMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The NHS Long Term Plan aims to implement tobacco treatment services in all hospitals by 2024, based on the Ottawa Model for Smoking Cessation (OMSC) which has been shown to reduce readmissions and mortality.1 Respiratory patients have a high risk of readmission, with some data showing that almost a quarter were admitted within 30 days of discharge.2 We began implementation of an inpatient Stop Smoking Service at Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (LTHT) in November 2022. This was funded by Yorkshire Cancer Research. Current smokers were identified on admission by nursing staff on admission and approached by a Stop Smoking Advisor (SSA) on an opt-out basis. We performed a retrospective audit on respiratory inpatients who were approached by a SSA during the initial 6 months of our programme and any readmissions over a 12-month period were identified via electronic patient records. 182 patients were offered treatment for tobacco dependence. 46% agreed to a supported quit attempt including behavioural intervention and either licensed medication, unlicensed nicotine-containing products or without pharmacotherapy. 54% did not agree to a supported quit attempt. They either declined support, opted for smoking reduction, had supported temporary abstinence, or were already attempting an unsupported quit attempt. 43% of those who accepted a fully supported quit attempt achieved a self-reported 4-week quit. Among patients who accepted a supported quit attempt, 46% were readmitted compared to 51% patients who did not accept a supported quit attempt. This represents a 9% relative risk reduction, or number needed to treat of 21.8 to prevent a readmission (p=0.54). The service has been scaled up across inpatient wards in LTHT. In the first year 1,591 patients have received support and there were 340 4-week quits, of which majority were self-reported. Our data shows that treating tobacco dependence in respiratory inpatients prevents readmissions. This supports the continued implementation of tobacco treatment services in hospitals. References Mullen KA, Manuel DG, Hawken SJ, et al. Effectiveness of a hospital-initiated smoking cessation programme: 2-year health and healthcare outcomes. Tob Control 2017;26:293–9. Stone R, et al. National COPD Audit Programme Outcomes 2014.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→