MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404047387 · doi:10.23977/aetp.2024.080611

Construction of Chinese Language Teaching and Training Platform for International Students Based on Multimodal Tourism Language Landscape

2024· article· en· W4404047387 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Educational Technology and Psychology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSecond Language Learning and Teaching
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourismTraining (meteorology)Computer scienceLinguisticsPsychologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current Chinese language teaching resources are often limited to traditional forms such as textbooks, PPTs, videos, etc., lacking diverse teaching methods. There is a significant gap between the language environment in real life and the content of classroom teaching, which cannot fully meet the learning needs of international students from different countries and language backgrounds. Therefore, this article constructed a Chinese language teaching and training platform for international students based on a multimodal tourism language landscape. This article first provided an overview of the definition and characteristics of multimodal concepts and tourism language landscapes, and elaborated on the current situation and problems of Chinese language teaching for international students. Subsequently, the Chinese language teaching and analysis for international students were introduced, and the application of multimodal tourism language landscape in Chinese language teaching was listed. Then, a cloud environment based on multimedia network was constructed for platform operation, and a virtual simulation training platform and different module functions were designed under situational teaching mode. Finally, the Chinese language teaching and training platform for international students can be put into practical application. The experimental results demonstrated that the average exam scores of students in the listening, speaking, reading, and writing modules were 28.56, 26.14, 24.56, and 27.34, respectively, all showing excellent progress. The impact of multimodal teaching on the learning of Chinese dietary vocabulary is particularly significant. The performance gap between groups began to show, especially after 22.5 hours, when the total scores of the three groups of students significantly widened, with nearly half of the participants preferring multimodal teaching methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Educational Technology and PsychologySame topicSecond Language Learning and TeachingFrench-language works237,207