Angiopoietin 1 Attenuates Dysregulated Angiogenesis in the Gastrocnemius of DMD Mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a degenerative neuromuscular disease caused by a lack of functional dystrophin. Ang 1 paracrine signalling maintains the endothelial barrier of blood vessels, preventing plasma leakage. Chronic inflammation, a consequence of DMD, causes endothelial barrier dysfunction in skeletal muscle. We aim to elucidate changes in the DMD mouse’s gastrocnemius microvascular niche following local administration of Ang 1. Gastrocnemii were collected from eight-week-old mdx/utrn+/− and healthy mice. Additional DMD cohort received an intramuscular injection of Ang 1 to gastrocnemius and contralateral control. Gastrocnemii were collected for analysis after two weeks. Using immunohistochemistry and real-time quantitative reverse transcription, we demonstrated an abundance of endothelial cells in DMD mouse’s gastrocnemius, but morphology and gene expression were altered. Myofiber perimeters were shorter in DMD mice. Following Ang 1 treatment, fewer endothelial cells were present, and microvessels were more circular. Vegfr1, Vegfr2, and Vegfa expression in Ang 1-treated gastronemii increased, while myofiber size distribution was consistent with vehicle-only gastrocnemii. These results suggest robust angiogenesis in DMD mice, but essential genes were underexpressed—furthermore, exogenous Ang 1 attenuated angiogenesis. Consequentially, gene expression increased. The impact must be investigated further, as Ang 1 therapy may be pivotal in restoring the skeletal muscle microvascular niche.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".