Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oral speech is an important element in the study and description of Francophone cultures and literatures. It is often the starting point in thinking about their specificity. The cultures of northern and southern Francophonie contain a special linguistic heritage and a special historical context of oral speech functioning. In conditions of multiculturalism, multilingualism and colonial domination, it acts as the most important marker of national identity. At the same time, oral speech also appears as a kind of universal, marking the starting point for the development of any literature. Quebec poetry of the last third of the 20th century is a multifaceted phenomenon. It is the bearer of important innovations, reflecting the main trends and literary themes characteristic of each era. At the same time, Quebec poetry of the specified period of the 20th century also acts as an expression of a specifically Quebec tradition. The latter can be considered as a collective phenomenon, fitting into the Quebec poetic tradition with its sociocultural dominants, the oral nature of the presentation, as a kind of sound and visual anthology of modern Quebec poetry. It also allows us to reflect the work of a significant number of poets. Within the framework of the article, special attention will be paid to the issue of analyzing Quebec poetry as a form of oral heritage and a means of sociocultural and linguistic identification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".