Protein Biomarkers of Adverse Clinical Features and Events in Sarcomeric Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a heterogeneous condition that can lead to atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and sudden cardiac death in many individuals but mild clinical impact in others. The mechanisms underlying this phenotypic heterogeneity are not well defined. The aim of this study was to use plasma proteomic profiling to help illuminate biomarkers that reflect or inform the heterogeneity observed in HCM. METHODS: The Olink antibody-based proteomic platform was used to measure plasma proteins in patients with genotype positive (sarcomeric) HCM participating in the HCM Registry. We assessed associations between plasma protein levels with clinical features, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging metrics, and the development of atrial fibrillation. RESULTS: We measured 275 proteins in 701 patients with sarcomeric HCM. There were associations between late gadolinium enhancement with proteins reflecting neurohormonal activation (NT-proBNP [N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide] and ACE2 [angiotensin-converting enzyme 2]). Metrics of left ventricular remodeling had novel associations with proteins involved in vascular development and homeostasis (vascular endothelial growth factor-D and TM [thrombomodulin]). Assessing clinical features, the European Society of Cardiology sudden cardiac death risk score was inversely associated with SCF (stem cell factor). Incident atrial fibrillation was associated with mediators of inflammation and fibrosis (MMP2 [matrix metalloproteinase 2] and SPON1 [spondin 1]). CONCLUSIONS: Proteomic profiling of sarcomeric HCM identified biomarkers associated with adverse imaging and clinical phenotypes. These circulating proteins are part of both established pathways, including neurohormonal activation and fibrosis, and less familiar pathways, including endothelial function and inflammatory proteins less well characterized in HCM. These findings highlight the value of plasma profiling to identify biomarkers of risk and to gain further insights into the pathophysiology of HCM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".