MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404054121 · doi:10.1016/j.hctj.2024.100079

Transition to adult healthcare for immigrant youth: Practice recommendations

2024· article· en· W4404054121 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Andrew S. Mackie, Mia Tulli-Shah, Alyssa Chappell, Michael Kariwo, Siciida Ibrahim, Bukola Salami

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth Care Transitions · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersChildren's Hospital FoundationStollery Children’s Hospital FoundationWomen and Children's Health Research InstituteChildren's Health Research Institute
KeywordsImmigrationTransition (genetics)Health carePsychologyPolitical scienceSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The transition from pediatric to adult healthcare is challenging for adolescents and young adults (AYA) with pediatric-onset chronic health conditions. Although barriers faced by AYA during transition are well-documented, previous studies have not considered how migration and settlement impact patient and family experiences. To fill this gap, we conducted a qualitative descriptive study to explore the recommendations for policy and practice from the perspectives of immigrant and refugee AYA living with chronic health conditions in Canada as they transition from pediatric to adult healthcare. We also sought the perspectives of their parents/caregivers and service providers. Semi-structured individual interviews and focus groups were conducted with 20 AYA, 14 caregivers, and 5 service providers. AYA were 1st or 2nd generation immigrants to Canada, aged 16–25, with childhood-onset chronic health conditions. Parents or caregivers were 1st generation immigrants, having children with chronic health conditions. Service providers delivered healthcare or other services to immigrant populations. Recommendations to improve the transition process and mitigate barriers to care included providing more accessible information about patients’ health conditions prior to transition, moving the age of transfer beyond age 18, establishing a centralized online health portal for patients who are transitioning to the adult system, providing family case workers, increasing language support, and increasing cross-sector support. A broad range of recommendations aimed at improving the transition process were provided. Future interventions to support transition from pediatric to adult care for immigrants and refugees should incorporate these recommendations. • Immigrant youth living chronic health conditions face major transition hurdles • Barriers to transition include language barriers, discrimination, and finances • Recommendations include providing increased information about patients’ health conditions prior to transition, moving the age of transition later, a centralized online health portal for patients who are transitioning to the adult system, the provision of family case workers, increasing language support, and increasing cross-sector support

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.048
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.095

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.048
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.010
Open science0.0060.009
Research integrity0.0090.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.473
Teacher spread0.395 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealth Care TransitionsSame topicAdolescent and Pediatric HealthcareFrench-language works237,207