MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404056136 · doi:10.1016/j.artd.2024.101552

Impact of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia on Postoperative Complications and Periprosthetic Joint Infections After Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2024· review· en· W4404056136 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sina Esmaeili, Hannaneh Razaghi, Mahda Malekshahi, Mohammad Soleimani, Seyyed Hossein Shafiei, Mohammadreza Golbakhsh

Bibliographic record

VenueArthroplasty Today · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePeriprostheticJoint arthroplastyMeta-analysisHyperplasiaSurgeryTotal hip arthroplastyArthroplastyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures each year, offering considerable cost-effectiveness and numerous benefits. However, certain postoperative complications can be observed following TJA. While the relationship between various comorbidities and these complications has been well-documented, this study aims to specifically investigate the impact of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) on postoperative outcomes. Methods: For this systematic review, we searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science using terms like "total hip arthroplasty," "total knee arthroplasty," "BPH," and "benign prostatic hypertrophy." Screening of retrieved articles was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies comparing complications in TJA between patients with and without preexisting BPH were eligible for inclusion. Data extraction was performed on the included articles, and their quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. A meta-analysis was conducted using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Results: This systematic review encompassed 4 articles evaluating TJA outcomes in men with a history of BPH, involving a total of 75,222 male cases. Among these, 17,183 cases (23%) presented with symptomatic BPH. The meta-analysis revealed that the incidence rate of periprosthetic joint infection did not significantly differ between BPH and non-BPH groups across both total hip and knee arthroplasty cases (odds ratio [OR] (95% confidence interval [CI]) = 1.28 [0.92-1.79]). However, postoperative urinary retention was significantly higher among patients with BPH (OR [95% CI] = 3.43 [2.04-5.78]). Additionally, patients with BPH exhibited a notably elevated incidence of postoperative urinary tract infection (OR [95% CI] = 2.55 [2.33-2.79]), as well as sepsis (OR [95% CI] = 1.31 [1.09-1.58]). Conclusions: It is noteworthy that while patients with BPH are prone to certain complications, meta-analysis indicate that BPH cannot be considered a comorbidity that increases the risk of periprosthetic joint infection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.745
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArthroplasty TodaySame topicUrinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchFrench-language works237,207