MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hardened-TC: A Low-cost Reliability Solution for CNNs Run by Modern GPUs

2024· article· en· W4404057431 on OpenAlexaff
Ehsan Atoofian

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReliability (semiconductor)Computer scienceParallel computingPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have become a compelling solution for various applications such as image classification, object detection, and climate studies. The introduction of tensor cores (TCs) in NVIDIA GPUs targets the acceleration of neural network computations. While there have been numerous studies on the performance and power of TCs, the reliability of TCs received little attention, particularly at the hardware level. Recently, CNNs have been deployed into safety-critical applications such as self-driving cars. Soft errors caused by high-energy particles are concerning as they can lead to catastrophic failures in CNN systems. The high power and area cost of traditional methods for building resilient systems such as triple modular redundancy make selective protection techniques attractive. We propose a hardware-based selective protection mechanism where vulnerable components of a CNN are implemented on resilient TCs. Resizing transistors in hardened TCs offers a low-cost solution to boost the reliability of CNNs. We also propose a precision-aware approach to optimize hardened TCs further. CNNs are resilient to approximation and quite often do not require full precision. By dropping transistor resizing in the least significant bits of network parameters, we are able to offer a low-cost reliability solution for CNNs implemented on TCs while maintaining the accuracy of the original network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.824
Threshold uncertainty score0.480

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207