Learning-based cooperative content caching and sharing for multi-layer vehicular networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Caching and sharing the content files are critical and fundamental for various future vehicular applications. However, how to satisfy the content demands in a timely manner with limited storage is an open issue owing to the high mobility of vehicles and the unpredictable distribution of dynamic requests. To better serve the requests from the vehicles, a cache-enabled multi-layer architecture, consisting of a Micro Base Station (MBS) and several Small Base Stations (SBSs), is proposed in this paper. Considering that vehicles usually travel through the coverage of multiple SBSs in a short time period, the cooperative caching and sharing strategy is introduced, which can provide comprehensive and stable cache services to vehicles. In addition, since the content popularity profile is unknown, we model the content caching problems in a Multi-Armed Bandit (MAB) perspective to minimize the total delay while gradually estimating the popularity of content files. The reinforcement learning-based algorithms with a novel Q-value updating module are employed to update the caching files in different timescales for MBS and SBSs, respectively. Simulation results show the proposed algorithm outperforms benchmark algorithms with static or varying content popularity. In the high-speed environment, the cooperation between SBSs effectively improves the cache hit rate and further improves service performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".