MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404058668 · doi:10.3390/curroncol31110503

Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in PI-RADS 3 Lesions Using T2w-Derived Radiomics Feature Maps in 3T Prostate MRI

2024· article· en· W4404058668 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Laura J. Jensen, Damon Kim, Thomas Elgeti, Ingo G. Steffen, Lars-Arne Schaafs, Matthias Haas, Lukas Kurz, Bernd Hamm, Sebastian N. Nagel

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Oncology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUCB PharmaRespicardiaSt. Jude MedicalSamsungSirtex MedicalSymphogenTauRx PharmaceuticalsSeagenSarepta TherapeuticsFriedrich-Schiller-Universität JenaTaiho PharmaceuticalVertex PharmaceuticalsServierSpectrum PharmaceuticalsTeva Pharmaceutical IndustriesSanofi
KeywordsRadiomicsMedicineProstate cancerProstateBI-RADSMultiparametric MRIFeature (linguistics)T2 weightedRadiologyCancerMagnetic resonance imagingPathologyInternal medicineBreast cancerMammography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1 (PI-RADS) category 3 lesions are a challenge in the clinical workflow. A better detection of the infrequently occurring clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in PI-RADS 3 lesions is an important objective. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if feature maps calculated from T2-weighted (T2w) 3 Tesla (3T) MRI can help detect csPCa in PI-RADS category 3 lesions. In-house biparametric 3T prostate MRI examinations acquired between January 2019 and June 2023 because of elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were retrospectively screened. Inclusion criteria were a PI-RADS 3 lesion and available results of an ultrasound-guided targeted and systematic biopsy. Exclusion criteria were a simultaneous PI-RADS category 4 or 5 lesion and hip replacement. Target lesions with the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group 1 were rated clinically insignificant PCa (ciPCa) and ≥2 csPCa. This resulted in 52 patients being included in the final analysis, of whom 11 (21.1%), 8 (15.4%), and 33 (63.5%) patients had csPCa, ciPCa, and no PCa, respectively, with the latter two groups being combined as non-csPCa. Eight of the csPCas were located in the peripheral zone (PZ) and three in the transition zone (TZ). In the non-csPCa group, 29 were located in the PZ and 12 in the TZ. Target lesions were marked with volumes of interest (VOIs) on axial T2w images. Axial T2w images were then converted to 93 feature maps. VOIs were copied into the maps, and feature quantity was retrieved directly. Features were tested for significant differences with the Mann-Whitney U-test. Univariate models for single feature performance and bivariate models implementing PSA density (PSAD) were calculated. Ten map-derived features differed significantly between the csPCa and non-csPCa groups (AUCs: 0.70-0.84). The diagnostic performance for TZ lesions (AUC: 0.83-1.00) was superior to PZ lesions (AUC: 0.74-0.85). In the bivariate models, performance in the PZ improved with AUCs >0.90 throughout. Parametric feature maps alone and as bivariate models with PSAD can (?) noninvasively identify csPCa in PI-RADS 3 lesions and could serve as a quantitative tool reducing ambiguity in PI-RADS 3 lesions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.434
Teacher spread0.371 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent OncologySame topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingFrench-language works237,207